Background scenarios to the election

.

Yayınlanma: 22.05.2018 - 13:32
Abone Ol google-news
 
 
Even if the election atmosphere has yet to grip the streets, predictions and discussions
intensify about who will get what vote, whether the presidential election will go to a second
round and possible parliamentary arithmetic. But, one significant difference about this
election is that the hidden scenarios have yet to receive much attention even though there are
but days to go.
• What impact is discussion of the economic crisis having on the election?
We are going through an experience rarely encountered in the realm of political science and
political communications, not only for Turkey but probably in the entire world. The ruling
party is attempting to use the risk of an economic crisis as an advantage and to turn stability
into blackmail. Criticising the opposition by saying, “They have no other project apart from
turfing us out,” it says with reference to the collapse of major indicators, not least foreign
exchange, “The mere possibility of change has done this. Just think what will happen if there
is a change of power.”
It is debatable how much the out-of-proportion election packages will influence the
electorate. But, certain indisputable consequences are undoubtedly making themselves felt at
large: First, assuaging the concerns of circles who derive direct benefit from the ruling body
and, according to some, account for one-third of the AKP’s vote (around fifteen per cent of
the total vote). Second, through an assault with multifarious pledges, destroying the focus of
the opposing campaign by dragging the opposition into an area in which it is hard for it to
compete in the short term.
• Are relations with the West and the international system changing?
Various spins have been put on Erdoğan’s trip to Britain and the article that appeared in the
The Times whose message could be interpreted as, “It would be more intelligent to keep
going with this ruling body.” Speculation that descends into deep plots entails the raising of
such questions as whether the AKP has reached fresh agreement with the West or if the West
is looking for a new actor. Cited as evidence are the failure for the Jerusalem affair,
potentially a productive source of pre-election propaganda, to be milked to the expected
degree and the deafening lack of anti-Western clamour. It is a reality that the international
system and economic power centres more greatly want and support certain political results.
The appearance of having obtained approval from these entities is an argument frequently
resorted to by the holders of power. However, it is clear that politics is not an area that is
governed purely by “centres of power.” Were this so, the claim, “this ruling body has
definitely fallen from grace” previously made by those who tout such arguments would by
now have engendered a result.
• Will the alliances in the election process suffer defeat on 24 June?
One point surrounding the election that engenders much discussion is, regardless of the
result, the kind of coalition that the new governing entity will create and how the alliances
will be transplanted into the post-electoral landscape. The ruling body has for some time
taken to criticising the opposition, not as a monolithic opposing front, but in terms of the
differences inherent in its lack of cohesion. With the postulation “They’re all the same” no
longer serving any purpose, there is an attempt to undermine the opposition by saying,
“They’re all different.”
A reshaping of the alliance is also being mooted by the current governing body. There is talk
in the lobbies of the AKP preparing alternatives depending on the results or to counter clear
threats. A number of options are said to be on the table from a change of partner to policy
realignment. But, on the governing front, uncertainty rather than a defined position in this
regard is deemed more beneficial mindful both of keeping all potential benefits alive and the
confusion this sows on the other side
• What lies behind the harmonisation law initiative and talk of talk of them having A, B and
C plans?
An unending election-related discussion keeps going with new arguments: There is talk of a
variety of scenarios going as far as the election having no importance, the infrastructure of
the new regime already having been set up, surprise preparations having been made for the
election result and even that the election may not be held under some pretext. Each word that
is spoken and each step that is taken is used as proof of these scenarios and hidden agendas.
Erdoğan, who has not yet managed to create the impression of being the undisputed victor of
the election, the dominator of the agenda and the sole playmaker of politics, has for some
time been using these conspiracy scenarios that are multiplying in opposition circles to
further an effortless display of power. The belief that he will absolutely find a way of
winning or will withhold consent even if he loses feeds the perception of invincibility. The
threat of instability/destabilisation works in the governing body’s favour.
• Are claims of the results being open to surprise and a “bounce-back from the bottom”
realistic?
Research and analyses that merit consideration do not speak of very radical shifts between
voting blocks. There is nevertheless talk of a bounce-back that has yet to turn into
determinable trends and the potential for a surprise result. The capability of alliances to turn
very small percentages into large differences and the impossibility of fully measuring the
effect that the shattering of certain preconceptions has created and will create fuel
expectations of a surprise. But, as to what the surprise will be, this remains an enigma. The
opposition parties voice the claim that a bounce-back the like of which has rarely been
witnessable is taking place. Particularly spokespersons of the Good Party and SP who allege
that they will take votes from the governing party. Both the governing party and the
opposition allege that the electorate is readying itself to deliver a slap and treat 24 June as a
fresh starting point. With certain claims supported by exaggerated and suspicion-provoking
polls, great recourse is made to the thesis that the true result is not fully measurable.
Unknowability is everyone’s game.
 
 
 
 

Cumhuriyet Tatil Otel Rezervasyon

En Çok Okunan Haberler